San Francisco
Menu

Adam Wood

Commissioner, San Francisco Civil Service Commission

We identified Wood’s voice at 17 meetings.

17 of 20transcribed meetings with their voice identified
4 of 4present at roll calls through Aug 17, 2026, from the clerk

Next Civil Service Commission meeting: Mon, Nov 2, 2:00 pm · Agenda

Every roll call, and Wood’s other bodies

Present at 4 of 4 roll calls at the Civil Service Commission, roll call through Aug 17, 2026

From the clerk’s own record. We don’t compare members on it.

PresentExcusedAbsentOldest first, 1 square per roll call

Absent 0. May 18, 2026 to Aug 17, 2026. The clerk’s record covers 4 of the 21 meetings we hold, through Aug 17, 2026.

Official roll call, from the clerk →
  • Civil Service Commission: talk time not compared. Recounting: the Civil Service Commission meeting of 2026-07-20 had been listed as two meetings (its two videos); talk time returns once it is recounted as one.
Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Wood’s voice

17, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Wood’s first remark.

  1. Oct 5, 2026Civil Service Commission3.3 min1:12:33
  2. Sep 25, 2026Civil Service Commission0.4 min6:59
  3. Jul 20, 2026Civil Service Commission2.2 min39:45
  4. Aug 17, 2026Civil Service Commission2.8 min36:00
  5. Jul 20, 2026Civil Service Commission2.9 min33:21
  6. Jun 18, 2026Civil Service Commission3.5 min25:09
  7. Jun 15, 2026Civil Service Commission5.8 min1:20:07
  8. May 18, 2026Civil Service Commission6.4 min1:03:54
  9. May 4, 2026Civil Service Commission7.0 min20:05
  10. Apr 20, 2026Civil Service Commission5.3 min41:22
Show all 17Show fewer
  1. Apr 6, 2026Civil Service Commission3.7 min22:10
  2. Mar 16, 2026Civil Service Commission4.8 min57:09
  3. Feb 2, 2026Civil Service Commission5.2 min1:14:42
  4. Jan 26, 2026Civil Service Commission0.2 min1:37:59
  5. Dec 15, 2025Civil Service Commission1.1 min1:19:36
  6. Dec 1, 2025Civil Service Commission4.2 min25:21
  7. Nov 17, 2025Civil Service Commission1.2 min17:07
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Wood was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Adam Wood’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Wood said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Wood or of San Francisco alone.