San Francisco
Menu

Alysabeth Alexander-Tut

BIC president, Seat 5, San Francisco Building Inspection Commission

Runs the Building Inspection Commission’s meetings; we identified Alexander-Tut’s voice at 10 of its 11 meetings.

10 of 11transcribed meetings with their voice identified

Presides over the Building Inspection Commission

See all
Talk time, and Alexander-Tut’s other bodies
Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Alexander-Tut’s voice

10, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Alexander-Tut’s first remark.

  1. Aug 19, 2026Building Inspection Commission13.0 min2:04
  2. Jul 15, 2026Building Inspection CommissionDevelopment and land use3.7 min1:20:14
  3. May 20, 2026Building Inspection CommissionHousing and tenants · Budget and spending1.9 min56:36
  4. Apr 15, 2026Building Inspection CommissionDevelopment and land use17.3 min37:33
  5. Mar 18, 2026Building Inspection CommissionDevelopment and land use11.9 min29:04
  6. Feb 18, 2026Building Inspection CommissionDevelopment and land use8.3 min2:43
  7. Feb 11, 2026Building Inspection CommissionBudget and spending8.7 min27:07
  8. Jan 21, 2026Building Inspection CommissionDevelopment and land use6.6 min1:06
  9. Dec 17, 2025Building Inspection CommissionDevelopment and land use6.6 min36:58
  10. Nov 14, 2025Building Inspection CommissionDevelopment and land use4.8 min36:20
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

We identified Alexander-Tut’s voice at 10 meetings. A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Alexander-Tut was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Alysabeth Alexander-Tut’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Alexander-Tut said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Alexander-Tut or of San Francisco alone.