San Francisco
Menu

Angelique Tompkins

Vice president, San Francisco Commission on the Environment

We identified Tompkins’ voice at six meetings.

Every roll call

Present at 2 of 2 roll calls at the Commission on the Environment

From the clerk’s own record. We don’t compare members on it.

PresentExcusedAbsentOldest first, 1 square per roll call

Absent 0. Jun 22, 2026 to Aug 24, 2026. The clerk’s record covers 2 of the 9 meetings we hold, through Aug 24, 2026.

Official roll call, from the clerk →
Neighborhoods Tompkins named

One place Tompkins named in meetings

Lines where Tompkins named the place, read by two AI readers that both agree it means that place. Each dot plays the newest one; brighter means named more often.

San Francisco
  • Bayview Hunters Point 4 times

Places are drawn at the centre of their own boundary in the city’s Analysis Neighborhoods file (DataSF (City and County of San Francisco)). A dot says the place was named, not where Tompkins was or what was said about it.

Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Tompkins’ voice

Six, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Tompkins’ first remark.

  1. Aug 24, 2026Commission on the Environment3.3 min8:28
  2. Jun 22, 2026Commission on the Environment0.1 min26:49
  3. Apr 27, 2026Commission on the Environment2.4 min1:41:12
  4. Mar 23, 2026Commission on the Environment3.2 min24:58
  5. Dec 2, 2025Commission on the Environment7.0 min1:15
  6. Oct 27, 2025Commission on the Environment4.9 min48:37
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Tompkins was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Angelique Tompkins’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Tompkins said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Tompkins or of San Francisco alone.