Bonnie Preston
Member, Seat 5, San Francisco Our City Our Home Oversight CommitteeRaised homelessness at four meetings.
Four clips, newest first
Officials only. Public speakers are counted, never named.
Issues Preston raised, by number of meetings
- Homelessness4 meetings
Every roll call
Present at 3 of 4 roll calls at the Our City Our Home Oversight Committee
Preston asked nine questions at the six Our City Our Home Oversight Committee meetings where we identified them
Of Preston’s 3 questions to city departments at the Our City Our Home Oversight Committee, 2 went to public health and mental health.
| Department | Share | Questions |
|---|---|---|
| Public health and mental health | 2 | |
| Housing | 1 |
Every meeting where we identified Preston’s voice
- Aug 27, 2026Our City Our Home Oversight Committee2.3 min56:36
- Jun 5, 2026Our City Our Home Oversight Committee1.6 min1:11:58
- May 28, 2026Our City Our Home Oversight CommitteeHomelessness1.7 min16:30
- Apr 23, 2026Our City Our Home Oversight Committee1.5 min39:58
- Mar 26, 2026Our City Our Home Oversight Committee1.8 min30:18
- Feb 26, 2026Our City Our Home Oversight CommitteeBudget and spending4.2 min16:39
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 410 council lines drawn, 352 right, 0 wrong, 1 unclear, 57 couldn’t be judged
We identified Preston’s voice at six meetings. A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Preston was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Bonnie Preston’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Preston said. For councils and their committees, of 410 lines drawn, 352 were right, 0 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 57. We have since removed the voices behind 110 of those lines (0 wrong, 1 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 300 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 268: all 268 right (90% lower bound 0.99). They couldn’t judge the other 32. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Preston or of San Francisco alone.