Dan Baroni
Commissioner, Seat 6, San Francisco Historic Preservation CommissionWe identified Baroni’s voice at eight meetings.
Next Historic Preservation Commission meeting: Wed, Nov 4, 12:30 pm · Clerk’s calendar
Every roll call
Present at 15 of 15 roll calls at the Historic Preservation Commission, roll call through Aug 19, 2026
Baroni asked five questions at the eight Historic Preservation Commission meetings where we identified them
Of Baroni’s 4 questions to city departments at the Historic Preservation Commission, 4 went to planning and zoning.
| Department | Share | Questions |
|---|---|---|
| Planning and zoning | 4 |
One place Baroni named in meetings
- Richmond District 1 time
Every meeting where we identified Baroni’s voice
- Sep 2, 2026Historic Preservation CommissionHistoric preservation1.0 min45:42
- Aug 19, 2026Historic Preservation CommissionHistoric preservation1.3 min19:17
- Aug 5, 2026Historic Preservation CommissionHistoric preservation2.5 min1:29:25
- May 20, 2026Historic Preservation CommissionHistoric preservation1.2 min30:57
- Apr 1, 2026Historic Preservation CommissionHistoric preservation0.7 min1:53:12
- Jan 21, 2026Historic Preservation Commission0.3 min1:39:24
- Jan 7, 2026Historic Preservation CommissionBusiness and economic development1.4 min44:57
- Nov 19, 2025Historic Preservation Commission0.4 min1:18:27
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged
A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Baroni was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Dan Baroni’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Baroni said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Baroni or of San Francisco alone.