San Francisco
Menu

Shawn P. Calhoun

President, San Francisco Library Commission

Runs the Library Commission’s meetings; we identified Calhoun’s voice at all 11 transcribed.

Every roll call, and Calhoun’s other bodies

Present at 6 of 6 roll calls at the Library Commission, roll call through Apr 16, 2026

From the clerk’s own record. We don’t compare members on it.

PresentExcusedAbsentOldest first, 1 square per roll call

Absent 0. Nov 20, 2025 to Apr 16, 2026. The clerk’s record covers 7 of the 12 meetings we hold, through Aug 20, 2026.

Official roll call, from the clerk →
  • Library Commission: talk time not compared. Presides over its meetings, so isn’t compared with the members.
Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Calhoun’s voice

11, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Calhoun’s first remark.

  1. Sep 17, 2026Library Commission9.2 min1:11
  2. Aug 20, 2026Library Commission7.1 min1:13
  3. Jul 16, 2026Library Commission3.0 min1:10
  4. Jun 18, 2026Library Commission6.6 min1:10
  5. May 21, 2026Library Commission4.3 min1:14
  6. Apr 16, 2026Library Commission5.2 min0:47
  7. Mar 19, 2026Library Commission7.7 min0:46
  8. Feb 12, 2026Library Commission13.6 min0:47
  9. Jan 15, 2026Library Commission5.8 min0:45
  10. Dec 18, 2025Library Commission3.3 min1:20:50
Show all 11Show fewer
  1. Nov 20, 2025Library Commission2.7 min39:30
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

We identified Calhoun’s voice at 11 meetings. A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Calhoun was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Shawn P. Calhoun’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Calhoun said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Calhoun or of San Francisco alone.