San Francisco
Menu
Photo: official page

Gale Rosboro

Member, Board of Supervisors, San Francisco Sheriff's Department Oversight Board

We identified Rosboro’s voice at five meetings.

5 of 8transcribed meetings with their voice identified
6questions at the Sheriff's Department Oversight Board
3 of 3present at roll calls through Aug 7, 2026, from the clerk

Next Sheriff's Department Oversight Board meeting: Fri, Nov 6, 2:00 pm · Clerk’s calendar

Every roll call, and Rosboro’s other bodies

Present at 3 of 3 roll calls at the Sheriff's Department Oversight Board, roll call through Aug 7, 2026

From the clerk’s own record. We don’t compare members on it.

PresentExcusedAbsentOldest first, 1 square per roll call

Absent 0. May 1, 2026 to Aug 7, 2026. The clerk’s record covers 9 of the 12 meetings we hold, through Aug 7, 2026.

Official roll call, from the clerk →
Questions

Rosboro asked six questions at the five Sheriff's Department Oversight Board meetings where we identified them

At least this many: direct questions only.

Of Rosboro’s 3 questions to city departments at the Sheriff's Department Oversight Board, 3 went to sheriff, jails and probation.

Who they question: 3 questions to a department, 1 body · Oct 24, 2025 – Oct 8, 2026.

Sheriff's Department Oversight Board3 questions to city departments
Sheriff's Department Oversight Board: questions by department
DepartmentShareQuestions
Sheriff, jails and probation3
Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Rosboro’s voice

Five, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Rosboro’s first remark.

  1. Oct 2, 2026Sheriff's Department Oversight BoardPolicing and public safety0.7 min26:40
  2. Sep 18, 2026Sheriff's Department Oversight BoardPolicing and public safety0.9 min10:32
  3. Aug 7, 2026Sheriff's Department Oversight BoardPolicing and public safety5.1 min10:37
  4. Jul 24, 2026Sheriff's Department Oversight Board0.8 min40:56
  5. May 1, 2026Sheriff's Department Oversight BoardPolicing and public safety1.7 min9:11
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Rosboro was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Gale Rosboro’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Rosboro said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Rosboro or of San Francisco alone.