San Francisco
Menu

Joaquin Guerrero

Commissioner, San Francisco Homelessness Oversight Commission

Raised homelessness at eight meetings.

9 of 11transcribed meetings with their voice identified
15.8min a meeting at the Homelessness Oversight Commission, at least
47questions at the Homelessness Oversight Commission
Share card

Three clips, newest first

“As long as you have them, I think for the public’s knowledge, that’s what matters. But just coming back to that 1,000, because it’s seems urgent with the deadline, the 1,000 emergency vouchers that will run out in October. So I just want to let the other commissioners know that that’s a pretty time-sensitive topic.”Joaquin GuerreroCommissioner · Homelessness Oversight Commission · Jan 15, 2026 · 1:30:43Play at 1:30:43
“Some folks were wondering about the Raphael House getting the multi-year general fund contract. Was there an RFP that went out for that, or how was that established?”Joaquin GuerreroCommissioner · Homelessness Oversight Commission · Feb 13, 2026 · 2:15:40Play at 2:15:40
“…the Kelly Cullen community site, that was supposed to be a pilot for high acuity, right? So is there a reason that we’re doing another one?”Joaquin GuerreroCommissioner · Homelessness Oversight Commission · Mar 5, 2026 · 1:54:13Play at 1:54:13

Officials only. Public speakers are counted, never named.

Issues Guerrero raised, by number of meetings

We count who raised an issue, not which side they took.

Questions

Guerrero asked 47 questions at the nine Homelessness Oversight Commission meetings where we identified them

At least this many: direct questions only.

Of Guerrero’s 32 questions to city departments at the Homelessness Oversight Commission, 31 went to homelessness services.

Who they question: 32 questions to a department, 1 body · Oct 24, 2025 – Oct 8, 2026.

Homelessness Oversight Commission32 questions to city departments
Homelessness Oversight Commission: questions by department
DepartmentShareQuestions
Homelessness services3197%
City attorney / law department13%
Neighborhoods Guerrero named

One place Guerrero named in meetings

Lines where Guerrero named the place, read by two AI readers that both agree it means that place. Each dot plays the newest one; brighter means named more often.

San Francisco
  • Bayview Hunters Point 1 time

Places are drawn at the centre of their own boundary in the city’s Analysis Neighborhoods file (DataSF (City and County of San Francisco)). A dot says the place was named, not where Guerrero was or what was said about it.

Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Guerrero’s voice

Nine, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Guerrero’s first remark.

  1. Oct 1, 2026Homelessness Oversight Commission22.3 min33:20
  2. Sep 3, 2026Homelessness Oversight Commission33.1 min59:14
  3. Aug 6, 2026Homelessness Oversight CommissionHomelessness20.8 min1:02:24
  4. Jun 4, 2026Homelessness Oversight Commission0.0 min3:10:52
  5. Apr 2, 2026Homelessness Oversight Commission34.5 min9:36
  6. Mar 5, 2026Homelessness Oversight CommissionHomelessness23.4 min4:18
  7. Feb 13, 2026Homelessness Oversight CommissionBudget and spending · Homelessness17.9 min44:53
  8. Jan 15, 2026Homelessness Oversight CommissionBudget and spending8.8 min1:23:37
  9. Nov 21, 2025Homelessness Oversight CommissionAppointments to boards and commissions12.6 min1:26:30
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

We identified Guerrero’s voice at nine meetings. A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Guerrero was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Joaquin Guerrero’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Guerrero said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Guerrero or of San Francisco alone.