San Francisco
Menu
Photo: official page

Kent Lim

Commissioner, San Francisco Commission on Community Investment and Infrastructure

We identified Lim’s voice at three meetings.

3 of 12transcribed meetings with their voice identified
8 of 11present at roll calls through Aug 18, 2026, from the clerk
Every roll call, and Lim’s other bodies

Present at 8 of 11 roll calls at the Commission on Community Investment and Infrastructure, roll call through Aug 18, 2026

From the clerk’s own record. We don’t compare members on it.

PresentExcusedAbsentOldest first, 1 square per roll call

Absent 3. Nov 18, 2025 to Aug 18, 2026. The clerk’s record covers 11 of the 14 meetings we hold, through Aug 18, 2026.

Official roll call, from the clerk →
Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Lim’s voice

Three, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Lim’s first remark.

  1. Jul 21, 2026Commission on Community Investment and InfrastructureDevelopment and land use3.2 min39:14
  2. Feb 3, 2026Commission on Community Investment and Infrastructure0.2 min35:27
  3. Jan 6, 2026Commission on Community Investment and InfrastructureBudget and spending1.7 min48:42
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Lim was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Kent Lim’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Lim said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Lim or of San Francisco alone.