San Francisco
Menu

Laura Thomas

Entertainment commissioner, Public Health Representative, San Francisco Entertainment Commission

We identified Thomas’ voice at four meetings.

Next Entertainment Commission meeting: Tue, Nov 3, 5:30 pm · Agenda

Every roll call, and Thomas’ other bodies

Present at 3 of 3 roll calls at the Entertainment Commission, roll call through Dec 16, 2025

From the clerk’s own record. We don’t compare members on it.

PresentExcusedAbsentOldest first, 1 square per roll call

Absent 0. Nov 4, 2025 to Dec 16, 2025. The clerk’s record covers 3 of the 17 meetings we hold, through Dec 16, 2025.

Official roll call, from the clerk →
  • Entertainment Commission: talk time not compared. On a random sample of meeting time, between 29% and 54% of members' speech here carries a name; we rank when the low end reaches 60%.
Neighborhoods Thomas named

One place Thomas named in meetings

Lines where Thomas named the place, read by two AI readers that both agree it means that place. Each dot plays the newest one; brighter means named more often.

San Francisco
  • Castro/Upper Market 3 times

Places are drawn at the centre of their own boundary in the city’s Analysis Neighborhoods file (DataSF (City and County of San Francisco)). A dot says the place was named, not where Thomas was or what was said about it.

Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Thomas’ voice

Four, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Thomas’ first remark.

  1. Sep 1, 2026Entertainment Commission3.6 min17:39
  2. Mar 3, 2026Entertainment Commission2.5 min7:09
  3. Feb 17, 2026Entertainment Commission1.5 min1:39:21
  4. Nov 4, 2025Entertainment Commission4.2 min54:16
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Thomas was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Laura Thomas’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Thomas said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Thomas or of San Francisco alone.