Mark Dunlop
Secretary, San Francisco Treasure Island Development AuthorityWe identified Dunlop’s voice at seven meetings.
Next Treasure Island Development Authority meeting: Fri, Nov 6, 10:00 am · Clerk’s calendar
Three clips, newest first
Officials only. Public speakers are counted, never named.
Issues Dunlop raised, by number of meetings
- Homelessness1 meeting
Dunlop asked 14 questions at the seven Treasure Island Development Authority meetings where we identified them
Of Dunlop’s 2 questions to city departments at the Treasure Island Development Authority, 2 went to transportation and transit.
| Department | Share | Questions |
|---|---|---|
| Transportation and transit | 2 |
One place Dunlop named in meetings
- Treasure Island 4 times
Every meeting where we identified Dunlop’s voice
- Jul 8, 2026Treasure Island Development AuthorityParks and recreation5.5 min30:23
- May 13, 2026Treasure Island Development AuthorityPublic transit4.2 min22:17
- Apr 8, 2026Treasure Island Development AuthorityBusiness and economic development2.1 min40:40
- Mar 11, 2026Treasure Island Development Authority2.6 min18:22
- Jan 14, 2026Treasure Island Development Authority3.5 min8:12
- Dec 10, 2025Treasure Island Development Authority1.6 min14:15
- Nov 19, 2025Treasure Island Development Authority1.3 min36:45
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged
A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Dunlop was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Mark Dunlop’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Dunlop said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Dunlop or of San Francisco alone.