Meredith Williams
Commissioner, San Francisco Recreation and Park CommissionWe identified Williams’ voice at nine meetings.
Every roll call, and Williams’ other bodies
Present at 8 of 9 roll calls at the Recreation and Park Commission, roll call through Jul 16, 2026
- Recreation and Park Commission: talk time not compared. On a random sample of meeting time, between 56% and 83% of members' speech here carries a name; we rank when the low end reaches 60%.
Williams asked 12 questions at the nine Recreation and Park Commission meetings where we identified them
Of Williams’ 10 questions to city departments at the Recreation and Park Commission, 10 went to parks and recreation.
| Department | Share | Questions |
|---|---|---|
| Parks and recreation | 10100% |
2 places Williams named in meetings
- Castro/Upper Market 1 time
- Golden Gate Park 1 time
Every meeting where we identified Williams’ voice
- Sep 17, 2026Recreation and Park CommissionParks and recreation2.1 min4:09
- Jul 16, 2026Recreation and Park CommissionParks and recreation1.9 min5:59
- Jun 18, 2026Recreation and Park CommissionParks and recreation5.2 min5:22
- May 21, 2026Recreation and Park Commission0.3 min1:56:31
- Mar 19, 2026Recreation and Park CommissionArts, culture and libraries2.1 min34:51
- Feb 19, 2026Recreation and Park CommissionParks and recreation8.7 min1:15:05
- Jan 15, 2026Recreation and Park CommissionBudget and spending · Parks and recreation1.4 min1:15:19
- Dec 18, 2025Recreation and Park CommissionParks and recreation6.0 min1:08:29
- Nov 20, 2025Recreation and Park Commission0.9 min19:58
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged
A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Williams was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Meredith Williams’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Williams said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Williams or of San Francisco alone.
