San Francisco
Menu

Patrick Boileau

Committee member, Committee, San Francisco General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee

We identified Boileau’s voice at three meetings.

3 of 5transcribed meetings with their voice identified
2 of 2present at roll calls through Jun 8, 2026, from the clerk
Every roll call, and Boileau’s other bodies

Present at 2 of 2 roll calls at the General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee, roll call through Jun 8, 2026

From the clerk’s own record. We don’t compare members on it.

PresentExcusedAbsentOldest first, 1 square per roll call

Absent 0. Apr 13, 2026 to Jun 8, 2026. The clerk’s record covers 5 of the 6 meetings we hold, through Jun 8, 2026.

Official roll call, from the clerk →
Neighborhoods Boileau named

2 places Boileau named in meetings

Lines where Boileau named the place, read by two AI readers that both agree it means that place. Each dot plays the newest one; brighter means named more often.

San Francisco
  • Potrero Hill 1 time
  • Sunset/Parkside 1 time

Places are drawn at the centre of their own boundary in the city’s Analysis Neighborhoods file (DataSF (City and County of San Francisco)). A dot says the place was named, not where Boileau was or what was said about it.

Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Boileau’s voice

Three, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Boileau’s first remark.

  1. Aug 10, 2026General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee1.2 min1:16:09
  2. Jun 8, 2026General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee0.1 min1:10:43
  3. Apr 13, 2026General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee0.7 min1:20
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 410 council lines drawn, 352 right, 0 wrong, 1 unclear, 57 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Boileau was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Patrick Boileau’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Boileau said. For councils and their committees, of 410 lines drawn, 352 were right, 0 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 57. We have since removed the voices behind 110 of those lines (0 wrong, 1 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 300 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 268: all 268 right (90% lower bound 0.99). They couldn’t judge the other 32. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Boileau or of San Francisco alone.