San Francisco
Menu

Paul Bendix

Council member, Council, San Francisco Mayor's Disability Council

We identified Bendix’s voice at five meetings.

5 of 6transcribed meetings with their voice identified
Talk time, and Bendix’s other bodies
Neighborhoods Bendix named

One place Bendix named in meetings

Lines where Bendix named the place, read by two AI readers that both agree it means that place. Each dot plays the newest one; brighter means named more often.

San Francisco
  • Glen Park 3 times

Places are drawn at the centre of their own boundary in the city’s Analysis Neighborhoods file (DataSF (City and County of San Francisco)). A dot says the place was named, not where Bendix was or what was said about it.

Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Bendix’s voice

Five, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Bendix’s first remark.

  1. Sep 18, 2026Mayor's Disability CouncilSchools and youth5.4 min15:58
  2. May 15, 2026Mayor's Disability CouncilBusiness and economic development · Public transit11.4 min0:56
  3. Mar 20, 2026Mayor's Disability CouncilBusiness and economic development2.9 min1:03:38
  4. Jan 16, 2026Mayor's Disability Council1.9 min1:03:18
  5. Nov 21, 2025Mayor's Disability Council2.2 min10:26
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Bendix was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Paul Bendix’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Bendix said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Bendix or of San Francisco alone.