San Francisco
Menu

Shanti Singh

Commissioner, Seat 5, San Francisco Local Agency Formation Commission

We identified Singh’s voice at four meetings.

Every roll call, and Singh’s other bodies

Present at 5 of 5 roll calls at the Local Agency Formation Commission

From the clerk’s own record. We don’t compare members on it.

PresentExcusedAbsentOldest first, 1 square per roll call

Absent 0. Jan 16, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026.

Official roll call, from the clerk →
Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Singh’s voice

Four, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Singh’s first remark.

  1. Sep 18, 2026Local Agency Formation CommissionHousing and tenants2.1 min22:20
  2. Jul 17, 2026Local Agency Formation CommissionHousing and tenants4.8 min16:02
  3. May 15, 2026Local Agency Formation Commission5.0 min20:38
  4. Jan 16, 2026Local Agency Formation CommissionAppointments to boards and commissions4.1 min26:58
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Singh was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Shanti Singh’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Singh said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Singh or of San Francisco alone.