Sharky Laguana
Commissioner, San Francisco Homelessness Oversight CommissionRaised homelessness at six meetings.
Four clips, newest first
Officials only. Public speakers are counted, never named.
Issues Laguana raised, by number of meetings
- Homelessness6 meetings
Laguana asked 42 questions at the eight Homelessness Oversight Commission meetings where we identified them
Of Laguana’s 39 questions to city departments at the Homelessness Oversight Commission, 38 went to homelessness services.
| Department | Share | Questions |
|---|---|---|
| Homelessness services | 3897% | |
| City attorney / law department | 13% |
Every meeting where we identified Laguana’s voice
- Sep 3, 2026Homelessness Oversight Commission16.8 min1:15:53
- Aug 6, 2026Homelessness Oversight CommissionHomelessness25.0 min31:12
- Jun 4, 2026Homelessness Oversight Commission0.7 min1:32:08
- Apr 2, 2026Homelessness Oversight Commission12.5 min8:33
- Mar 5, 2026Homelessness Oversight CommissionHomelessness15.6 min10:54
- Feb 13, 2026Homelessness Oversight CommissionBudget and spending · Homelessness18.4 min32:01
- Jan 15, 2026Homelessness Oversight CommissionBudget and spending5.9 min1:06:44
- Nov 21, 2025Homelessness Oversight Commission11.8 min8:54
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged
We identified Laguana’s voice at eight meetings. A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Laguana was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Sharky Laguana’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Laguana said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Laguana or of San Francisco alone.
