Stephen Nakajo
Commissioner, San Francisco Fire CommissionWe identified Nakajo’s voice at 10 meetings.
Every roll call
Present at 8 of 9 roll calls at the Fire Commission, roll call through Jul 8, 2026
6 places Nakajo named in meetings
- Chinatown 1 time
- Japantown 1 time
- Richmond District 1 time
- Sunset/Parkside 1 time
- Treasure Island 1 time
- Twin Peaks 1 time
Every meeting where we identified Nakajo’s voice
- Aug 12, 2026Fire CommissionFire and emergency services · Health and behavioral health15.0 min33:42
- Jul 8, 2026Fire CommissionFire and emergency services17.6 min50:43
- Jun 10, 2026Fire CommissionFire and emergency services14.3 min57:43
- May 13, 2026Fire CommissionFire and emergency services12.4 min30:39
- Apr 8, 2026Fire CommissionFire and emergency services2.8 min40:05
- Feb 11, 2026Fire CommissionBudget and spending · Fire and emergency services13.3 min22:57
- Jan 28, 2026Fire CommissionBudget and spending6.5 min33:20
- Jan 14, 2026Fire CommissionBudget and spending12.7 min59:32
- Dec 10, 2025Fire CommissionFire and emergency services8.2 min7:31
- Nov 12, 2025Fire CommissionFire and emergency services11.8 min50:24
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged
A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Nakajo was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Stephen Nakajo’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Nakajo said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Nakajo or of San Francisco alone.
