Vitus Leung
Commissioner, San Francisco Civil Service CommissionWe identified Leung’s voice at 13 meetings.
Next Civil Service Commission meeting: Mon, Nov 2, 2:00 pm · Agenda
Every roll call, and Leung’s other bodies
Present at 3 of 4 roll calls at the Civil Service Commission, roll call through Aug 17, 2026
- Civil Service Commission: talk time not compared. Recounting: the Civil Service Commission meeting of 2026-07-20 had been listed as two meetings (its two videos); talk time returns once it is recounted as one.
Every meeting where we identified Leung’s voice
- Oct 5, 2026Civil Service Commission1.3 min1:03:13
- Aug 3, 2026Civil Service Commission3.6 min8:04
- Jul 20, 2026Civil Service Commission3.2 min48:34
- Jun 18, 2026Civil Service Commission2.5 min1:59:40
- May 18, 2026Civil Service Commission7.2 min22:38
- May 4, 2026Civil Service Commission10.9 min1:03:18
- Apr 20, 2026Civil Service Commission0.8 min56:55
- Apr 6, 2026Civil Service Commission1.0 min46:04
- Mar 2, 2026Civil Service Commission14.9 min13:13
- Feb 2, 2026Civil Service Commission6.0 min36:10
Show all 13Show fewer
- Jan 26, 2026Civil Service Commission11.5 min20:24
- Dec 1, 2025Civil Service Commission3.2 min14:16
- Nov 3, 2025Civil Service Commission5.5 min15:15
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged
A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Leung was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Vitus Leung’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Leung said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Leung or of San Francisco alone.
