San Francisco
Menu

Wanda Jung

Commissioner, San Francisco Aging and Adult Services Commission

We identified Jung’s voice at eight meetings.

8 of 9transcribed meetings with their voice identified
8 of 8present at roll calls, from the clerk
Every roll call, and Jung’s other bodies

Present at 8 of 8 roll calls at the Aging and Adult Services Commission

From the clerk’s own record. We don’t compare members on it.

PresentExcusedAbsentOldest first, 1 square per roll call

Absent 0. Jan 7, 2026 to Sep 2, 2026. The clerk’s record covers 8 of the 9 meetings we hold, through Sep 2, 2026.

Official roll call, from the clerk →
  • Aging and Adult Services Commission: talk time not compared. On a random sample of meeting time, between 56% and 82% of members' speech here carries a name; we rank when the low end reaches 60%.
Neighborhoods Jung named

2 places Jung named in meetings

Lines where Jung named the place, read by two AI readers that both agree it means that place. Each dot plays the newest one; brighter means named more often.

San Francisco
  • Bayview Hunters Point 1 time
  • Excelsior 1 time

Places are drawn at the centre of their own boundary in the city’s Analysis Neighborhoods file (DataSF (City and County of San Francisco)). A dot says the place was named, not where Jung was or what was said about it.

Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Jung’s voice

Eight, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Jung’s first remark.

  1. Oct 7, 2026Aging and Adult Services CommissionBudget and spending6.7 min18:31
  2. Jul 1, 2026Aging and Adult Services Commission2.4 min38:28
  3. Jun 3, 2026Aging and Adult Services Commission2.0 min18:38
  4. May 6, 2026Aging and Adult Services CommissionBudget and spending3.5 min53:45
  5. Apr 1, 2026Aging and Adult Services Commission5.4 min38:02
  6. Mar 4, 2026Aging and Adult Services Commission1.8 min1:01:48
  7. Feb 18, 2026Aging and Adult Services CommissionBudget and spending1.1 min1:32:56
  8. Jan 7, 2026Aging and Adult Services CommissionBudget and spending4.6 min27:34
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Jung was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Wanda Jung’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Jung said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Jung or of San Francisco alone.