Alicia Ponce
Commission on Chicago Landmarks: Permit Review and Program CommitteesWe identified Ponce’s voice at four meetings across two bodies.
Also sits on 1 other body
Talk time, and Ponce’s other bodies
- Commission on Chicago Landmarks: Permit Review and Program Committees: talk time not compared. Seated for only 4 meetings in 12 months.
- Commission on Chicago Landmarks: talk time not compared. Seated for only 4 meetings in 12 months.
Every meeting where we identified Ponce’s voice
- Feb 5, 2026Commission on Chicago Landmarks: Permit Review and Program Committees2.9 min1:15:43
- Dec 4, 2025Commission on Chicago Landmarks: Permit Review and Program Committees0.7 min40:23
- Dec 4, 2025Commission on Chicago Landmarks0.7 min1:53:13
- Nov 6, 2025Commission on Chicago Landmarks1.4 min33:19
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 410 council lines drawn, 352 right, 0 wrong, 1 unclear, 57 couldn’t be judged
A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Ponce was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Alicia Ponce’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Ponce said. For councils and their committees, of 410 lines drawn, 352 were right, 0 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 57. We have since removed the voices behind 110 of those lines (0 wrong, 1 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 300 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 268: all 268 right (90% lower bound 0.99). They couldn’t judge the other 32. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Ponce or of Chicago alone.