Chicago
Menu
Photo: official page

Anjanette Young

Community organizer, South Side, Chicago Community Commission for Public Safety and Accountability

We identified Young’s voice at three meetings.

3 of 7transcribed meetings with their voice identified

Next Community Commission for Public Safety and Accountability meeting: Thu, Nov 12, 6:30 pm · Clerk’s calendar

Talk time, and Young’s other bodies
Neighborhoods Young named

One place Young named in meetings

Lines where Young named the place, read by two AI readers that both agree it means that place. Each dot plays the newest one; brighter means named more often.

Chicago
  • Morgan Park 1 time

Places are drawn at the centre of their own boundary in the city’s Boundaries - Community Areas file (City of Chicago Data Portal). A dot says the place was named, not where Young was or what was said about it.

Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Young’s voice

Three, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Young’s first remark.

  1. Aug 27, 2026Community Commission for Public Safety and Accountability0.8 min48:31
  2. Jul 30, 2026Community Commission for Public Safety and Accountability0.8 min1:51:57
  3. Jun 25, 2026Community Commission for Public Safety and Accountability1.6 min21:01
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Young was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Anjanette Young’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Young said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Young or of Chicago alone.