Chicago
Menu
Photo: official page

Marlon Everett

President, Chicago Park District Board of Commissioners

Runs the Chicago Park District Board of Commissioners’ meetings; we identified Everett’s voice at seven of its nine meetings.

7 of 9transcribed meetings with their voice identified

Presides over the Chicago Park District Board of Commissioners

See all
Talk time, and Everett’s other bodies
Neighborhoods Everett named

2 places Everett named in meetings

Lines where Everett named the place, read by two AI readers that both agree it means that place. Each dot plays the newest one; brighter means named more often.

Chicago
  • Washington Park 3 times, the most of any official
  • Dunning 1 time

Places are drawn at the centre of their own boundary in the city’s Boundaries - Community Areas file (City of Chicago Data Portal). A dot says the place was named, not where Everett was or what was said about it.

Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Everett’s voice

Seven, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Everett’s first remark.

  1. May 13, 2026Chicago Park District Board of Commissioners16.7 min13:23
  2. Apr 8, 2026Chicago Park District Board of Commissioners4.9 min15:10
  3. Mar 11, 2026Chicago Park District Board of Commissioners2.2 minVideo
  4. Feb 11, 2026Chicago Park District Board of Commissioners10.4 min19:32
  5. Jan 21, 2026Chicago Park District Board of Commissioners5.8 min14:31
  6. Dec 10, 2025Chicago Park District Board of Commissioners6.7 min0:18
  7. Nov 19, 2025Chicago Park District Board of Commissioners13.0 min22:48
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

We identified Everett’s voice at seven meetings. A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Everett was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Marlon Everett’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Everett said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Everett or of Chicago alone.