Los Angeles
Menu

April Sandifer

Commissioner, West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission

We identified Sandifer’s voice at 10 meetings.

10 of 12transcribed meetings with their voice identified

Next West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission meeting: Wed, Nov 4, 4:30 pm · Agenda

Talk time, and Sandifer’s other bodies
What they talk about

Development and land use took the largest share of Sandifer’s speech with a checked topic: 100%

By the topic two AI readers agree on for each stretch of their talk, at the West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission. 56 of 97 minutes of their speech have a checked topic. How much they talk about it, not which side they take.

Development and land use100%
Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Sandifer’s voice

10, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Sandifer’s first remark.

  1. Sep 2, 2026West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission5.4 min1:45:49
  2. Aug 19, 2026West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission14.5 min0:30
  3. Aug 5, 2026West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission17.6 min0:27
  4. Jul 1, 2026West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission17.4 min0:21
  5. May 20, 2026West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission4.6 min0:25
  6. May 6, 2026West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission10.2 min0:29
  7. Jan 21, 2026West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission5.1 minVideo
  8. Jan 7, 2026West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission1.0 minVideo
  9. Dec 17, 2025West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission10.5 min0:30
  10. Nov 19, 2025West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission10.5 minVideo
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Sandifer was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets April Sandifer’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Sandifer said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Sandifer or of Los Angeles alone.