Los Angeles
Menu

Brian Rosenstein

Member, Los Angeles City Planning Commission

We identified Rosenstein’s voice at 15 meetings.

What they talk about

Development and land use took the largest share of Rosenstein’s speech with a checked topic: 98%

By the topic two AI readers agree on for each stretch of their talk, at the City Planning Commission. 153 of 154 minutes of their speech have a checked topic. How much they talk about it, not which side they take.

Development and land use98%
Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Rosenstein’s voice

15, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Rosenstein’s first remark.

  1. Sep 10, 2026City Planning Commission0.6 min15:59
  2. Aug 27, 2026City Planning Commission8.0 min58:06
  3. Jul 9, 2026City Planning Commission7.2 min21:38
  4. Jun 25, 2026City Planning Commission13.3 min42:15
  5. Jun 11, 2026City Planning Commission17.3 min34:07
  6. May 14, 2026City Planning Commission11.8 min2:06:26
  7. Apr 23, 2026City Planning Commission22.2 min1:36:12
  8. Mar 26, 2026City Planning Commission6.6 min30:37
  9. Mar 12, 2026City Planning Commission10.5 min23:15
  10. Feb 26, 2026City Planning Commission14.4 min55:19
Show all 15Show fewer
  1. Feb 12, 2026City Planning Commission4.4 min20:05
  2. Jan 22, 2026City Planning Commission9.6 min5:57
  3. Jan 8, 2026City Planning Commission3.1 min39:58
  4. Dec 11, 2025City Planning Commission11.2 min19:44
  5. Nov 6, 2025City Planning Commission13.6 min9:27
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Rosenstein was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Brian Rosenstein’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Rosenstein said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Rosenstein or of Los Angeles alone.