Los Angeles
Menu

Caroline Choe

Vice-president, Los Angeles City Planning Commission

We identified Choe’s voice at 14 meetings.

Neighborhoods Choe named

3 places Choe named in meetings

Lines where Choe named the place, read by two AI readers that both agree it means that place. Each dot plays the newest one; brighter means named more often.

Los Angeles
  • Arts District 1 time
  • Hollywood 1 time
  • Venice 1 time

Places are drawn at the centre of their own boundary in the city’s Neighborhood Councils (Certified) file (City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Engineering (LA GeoHub)). A dot says the place was named, not where Choe was or what was said about it.

Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Choe’s voice

14, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Choe’s first remark.

  1. Aug 27, 2026City Planning Commission3.9 min2:51
  2. Aug 13, 2026City Planning Commission3.5 min25:32
  3. Jul 9, 2026City Planning Commission7.5 minVideo
  4. Jun 25, 2026City Planning Commission3.8 min22:39
  5. Jun 11, 2026City Planning Commission1.8 min1:36:29
  6. May 14, 2026City Planning Commission1.4 min2:25:00
  7. Apr 23, 2026City Planning Commission11.0 min2:13:29
  8. Mar 12, 2026City Planning Commission2.7 min21:07
  9. Feb 26, 2026City Planning Commission2.9 min1:30:42
  10. Feb 12, 2026City Planning Commission2.0 min26:41
Show all 14Show fewer
  1. Jan 22, 2026City Planning Commission1.4 min3:05
  2. Jan 8, 2026City Planning Commission0.9 min36:19
  3. Dec 11, 2025City Planning Commission2.1 min20:46
  4. Nov 6, 2025City Planning Commission3.8 min18:16
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Choe was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Caroline Choe’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Choe said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Choe or of Los Angeles alone.