Los Angeles
Menu

Elizabeth Zamora

Member, Los Angeles City Planning Commission

We identified Zamora’s voice at nine meetings.

9 of 16transcribed meetings with their voice identified
1.4min a meeting at the City Planning Commission, at least
Share card
Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Zamora’s voice

Nine, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Zamora’s first remark.

  1. Aug 13, 2026City Planning Commission1.1 min32:23
  2. Jun 11, 2026City Planning Commission8.6 min24:33
  3. May 14, 2026City Planning Commission0.6 min2:05:51
  4. Apr 23, 2026City Planning Commission5.4 min2:06:54
  5. Mar 12, 2026City Planning Commission2.3 min1:19:27
  6. Feb 26, 2026City Planning Commission1.0 min1:14:52
  7. Feb 12, 2026City Planning Commission1.0 min17:21
  8. Jan 8, 2026City Planning Commission0.9 min35:20
  9. Nov 6, 2025City Planning Commission1.6 min19:16
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Zamora was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Elizabeth Zamora’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Zamora said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Zamora or of Los Angeles alone.