Fernando Dutra

Former member, Los Angeles LA Metro Board of Directors

We identified Dutra’s voice at eight meetings.

Former member. Dutra’s term ended Jun 30, 2026; our record covers only the final months.

8 of 8transcribed meetings with their voice identified

Talk time, and Dutra’s other bodies

LA Metro Board of Directors: talk time not compared. Listed on the roster as Chair, so isn’t compared with the members.

Neighborhoods Dutra named

2 places Dutra named in meetings

Lines where Dutra named the place, read by two AI readers that both agree it means that place. Each dot plays the newest one; brighter means named more often.

Los Angeles

Downtown Los Angeles 1 time
San Pedro 1 time

Places are drawn at the centre of their own boundary in the city’s Neighborhood Councils (Certified) file (City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Engineering (LA GeoHub)). A dot says the place was named, not where Dutra was or what was said about it.

Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Dutra’s voice

Eight, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Dutra’s first remark.

May 28, 2026LA Metro Board of Directors16.1 min6:09
Apr 23, 2026LA Metro Board of Directors12.7 min4:27
Apr 15, 2026LA Metro Board of Directors6.0 min3:55
Mar 26, 2026LA Metro Board of Directors20.0 minVideo
Feb 26, 2026LA Metro Board of Directors16.4 min2:44
Jan 22, 2026LA Metro Board of Directors12.0 minVideo
Jan 14, 2026LA Metro Board of Directors7.8 minVideo
Dec 4, 2025LA Metro Board of Directors18.9 min1:10:22

How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 410 council lines drawn, 352 right, 0 wrong, 1 unclear, 57 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Dutra was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Fernando Dutra’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Dutra said. For councils and their committees, of 410 lines drawn, 352 were right, 0 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 57. We have since removed the voices behind 110 of those lines (0 wrong, 1 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 300 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 268: all 268 right (90% lower bound 0.99). They couldn’t judge the other 32. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Dutra or of Los Angeles alone.