Joe Goldman
Commissioner, West Los Angeles Area Planning CommissionWe identified Goldman’s voice at nine meetings.
Next West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission meeting: Wed, Nov 4, 4:30 pm · Agenda
Talk time, and Goldman’s other bodies
- West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission: talk time not compared. Fewer than four members can be compared fairly.
Development and land use took the largest share of Goldman’s speech with a checked topic: 100%
One place Goldman named in meetings
- Venice 1 time
Every meeting where we identified Goldman’s voice
- Sep 2, 2026West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission7.0 min1:34:48
- Aug 19, 2026West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission3.3 min1:32:29
- Aug 5, 2026West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission7.9 min1:06:54
- Jul 1, 2026West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission5.1 min1:39:53
- Jun 17, 2026West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission7.8 min1:47:29
- May 6, 2026West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission4.4 min40:16
- Dec 17, 2025West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission6.2 min2:01:17
- Nov 19, 2025West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission3.3 min14:18
- Nov 5, 2025West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission4.0 min36:17
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged
A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Goldman was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Joe Goldman’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Goldman said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Goldman or of Los Angeles alone.
