Los Angeles
Menu

Nurit D. Katz

Vice president, Los Angeles Board of Water and Power Commissioners

We identified Katz’s voice at six meetings.

6 of 8transcribed meetings with their voice identified
Talk time, and Katz’s other bodies
Neighborhoods Katz named

2 places Katz named in meetings

Lines where Katz named the place, read by two AI readers that both agree it means that place. Each dot plays the newest one; brighter means named more often.

Los Angeles
  • Chatsworth 1 time
  • Van Nuys 1 time

Places are drawn at the centre of their own boundary in the city’s Neighborhood Councils (Certified) file (City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Engineering (LA GeoHub)). A dot says the place was named, not where Katz was or what was said about it.

Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Katz’s voice

Six, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Katz’s first remark.

  1. Sep 22, 2026Board of Water and Power Commissioners1.7 min11:10
  2. Sep 8, 2026Board of Water and Power Commissioners1.2 min33:34
  3. Aug 25, 2026Board of Water and Power Commissioners8.2 min50:49
  4. Jul 14, 2026Board of Water and Power Commissioners0.1 min2:14
  5. Nov 18, 2025Board of Water and Power Commissioners11.7 min21:02
  6. Oct 28, 2025Board of Water and Power Commissioners3.9 min1:04:04
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Katz was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Nurit D. Katz’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Katz said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Katz or of Los Angeles alone.