Los Angeles
Menu

Sarah Johnson

Member, Los Angeles City Planning Commission

We identified Johnson’s voice at 14 meetings.

14 of 16transcribed meetings with their voice identified
1.7min a meeting at the City Planning Commission, at least
Share card
Neighborhoods Johnson named

One place Johnson named in meetings

Lines where Johnson named the place, read by two AI readers that both agree it means that place. Each dot plays the newest one; brighter means named more often.

Los Angeles
  • Venice 2 times

Places are drawn at the centre of their own boundary in the city’s Neighborhood Councils (Certified) file (City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Engineering (LA GeoHub)). A dot says the place was named, not where Johnson was or what was said about it.

Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Johnson’s voice

14, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Johnson’s first remark.

  1. Aug 13, 2026City Planning Commission1.1 min14:49
  2. Jul 9, 2026City Planning Commission0.7 min30:33
  3. Jun 25, 2026City Planning Commission1.7 min11:38
  4. Jun 11, 2026City Planning Commission5.0 min2:23
  5. May 14, 2026City Planning Commission1.9 min1:33:32
  6. Apr 23, 2026City Planning Commission1.6 min43:26
  7. Mar 26, 2026City Planning Commission0.4 min25:22
  8. Mar 12, 2026City Planning Commission4.0 min21:50
  9. Feb 26, 2026City Planning Commission3.9 min1:16:34
  10. Feb 12, 2026City Planning Commission1.6 min15:54
Show all 14Show fewer
  1. Jan 22, 2026City Planning Commission1.0 min14:37
  2. Jan 8, 2026City Planning Commission0.3 min34:54
  3. Dec 11, 2025City Planning Commission2.0 min20:19
  4. Nov 6, 2025City Planning Commission2.8 min3:12
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Johnson was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Sarah Johnson’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Johnson said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Johnson or of Los Angeles alone.