Tim Sandoval
Chair, Los Angeles LA Metro Finance, Budget and Audit CommitteeWe identified Sandoval’s voice at 13 meetings across three bodies.
Talk time, and Sandoval’s other bodies
- LA Metro Board of Directors: 0.6 min of speech a meeting, range 0.2–1.7. In the same range as seven other members.
- LA Metro Finance, Budget and Audit Committee: talk time not compared. Presides over its meetings, so isn’t compared with the members.
- LA Metro Executive Management Committee: talk time not compared. Ran some of its meetings, so isn’t compared with the members.
Every meeting where we identified Sandoval’s voice
- Sep 24, 2026LA Metro Board of Directors2.1 min1:39:22
- Sep 17, 2026LA Metro Finance, Budget and Audit Committee6.0 min3:02
- Sep 17, 2026LA Metro Executive Management Committee1.8 min13:46
- Jul 16, 2026LA Metro Finance, Budget and Audit Committee4.2 min2:56
- Jul 16, 2026LA Metro Executive Management Committee7.4 minVideo
- May 28, 2026LA Metro Board of Directors2.2 min2:09:45
- May 21, 2026LA Metro Finance, Budget and Audit Committee1.8 min7:40
- Apr 23, 2026LA Metro Board of Directors1.1 min1:04:35
- Apr 16, 2026LA Metro Finance, Budget and Audit Committee7.1 min2:29
- Mar 19, 2026LA Metro Finance, Budget and Audit Committee7.5 minVideo
Show all 13Show fewer
- Feb 26, 2026LA Metro Board of Directors0.9 min3:49
- Feb 19, 2026LA Metro Finance, Budget and Audit Committee2.2 min2:33
- Jan 15, 2026LA Metro Finance, Budget and Audit Committee4.7 min6:36
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 410 council lines drawn, 352 right, 0 wrong, 1 unclear, 57 couldn’t be judged
A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Sandoval was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Tim Sandoval’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Sandoval said. For councils and their committees, of 410 lines drawn, 352 were right, 0 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 57. We have since removed the voices behind 110 of those lines (0 wrong, 1 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 300 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 268: all 268 right (90% lower bound 0.99). They couldn’t judge the other 32. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Sandoval or of Los Angeles alone.
