Chris Yoon, R.A.
Commissioner, New York Board of Standards and AppealsWe identified R.A.’s voice at nine meetings.
Talk time, and R.A.’s other bodies
- Board of Standards and Appeals: talk time not compared. We could name only 14% of the speech they may have given; we compare members at 30%.
Every meeting where we identified R.A.’s voice
- Sep 15, 2026Board of Standards and Appeals6.8 min13:58
- Sep 14, 2026Board of Standards and Appeals4.4 min18:08
- Jul 27, 2026Board of Standards and Appeals17.7 min7:52
- Jun 1, 2026Board of Standards and Appeals10.1 min26:51
- Apr 28, 2026Board of Standards and Appeals12.9 min16:12
- Mar 24, 2026Board of Standards and Appeals17.7 min12:14
- Mar 10, 2026Board of Standards and Appeals13.4 min6:20
- Mar 9, 2026Board of Standards and Appeals2.2 min13:06
- Jan 12, 2026Board of Standards and Appeals12.8 min4:49
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged
A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that R.A. was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Chris Yoon, R.A.’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what R.A. said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of R.A. or of New York alone.