New York
Menu

Dara Ottley-Brown

Commissioner, New York Board of Standards and Appeals

We identified Ottley-Brown’s voice at 17 meetings.

17 of 25transcribed meetings with their voice identified
Talk time, and Ottley-Brown’s other bodies
Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Ottley-Brown’s voice

17, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Ottley-Brown’s first remark.

  1. Sep 15, 2026Board of Standards and Appeals2.3 min13:23
  2. Sep 14, 2026Board of Standards and Appeals3.0 min16:54
  3. Jul 27, 2026Board of Standards and Appeals13.4 min35:06
  4. Jun 2, 2026Board of Standards and Appeals10.9 min11:40
  5. Jun 1, 2026Board of Standards and Appeals3.4 min20:06
  6. May 12, 2026Board of Standards and Appeals7.3 min13:58
  7. May 11, 2026Board of Standards and Appeals1.3 min30:16
  8. Apr 28, 2026Board of Standards and Appeals5.5 min14:58
  9. Apr 14, 2026Board of Standards and Appeals7.1 min4:40
  10. Apr 13, 2026Board of Standards and Appeals4.5 min1:55
Show all 17Show fewer
  1. Mar 24, 2026Board of Standards and Appeals3.0 min9:28
  2. Mar 10, 2026Board of Standards and Appeals3.1 min23:02
  3. Mar 9, 2026Board of Standards and Appeals1.5 min33:27
  4. Feb 10, 2026Board of Standards and Appeals21.5 min11:03
  5. Jan 27, 2026Board of Standards and Appeals7.5 min12:22
  6. Jan 13, 2026Board of Standards and Appeals21.1 min8:36
  7. Jan 12, 2026Board of Standards and Appeals4.8 min11:10
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Ottley-Brown was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Dara Ottley-Brown’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Ottley-Brown said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Ottley-Brown or of New York alone.