New York
Menu

Kristy Marmorato

Former member, Council, New York City Council

We identified Marmorato’s voice at five meetings across two bodies.

Former member. Marmorato’s term ended Dec 31, 2025; our record covers only the final months.

Every roll call, and Marmorato’s other bodies

Present at 5 of 5 roll calls at the New York City Council, roll call through Dec 18, 2025

From the clerk’s own record. We don’t compare members on it.

PresentExcusedAbsentOldest first, 1 square per roll call

Absent 0. Oct 29, 2025 to Dec 18, 2025.

Official roll call, from the clerk →
Neighborhoods Marmorato named

One place Marmorato named in meetings

Lines where Marmorato named the place, read by two AI readers that both agree it means that place. Each dot plays the newest one; brighter means named more often.

New York
  • Bronx 1 time

Places are drawn at the centre of their own boundary in the city’s 2020 Neighborhood Tabulation Areas (NTAs) file (NYC Department of City Planning, via NYC Open Data). A dot says the place was named, not where Marmorato was or what was said about it.

Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Marmorato’s voice

Five, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Marmorato’s first remark.

  1. Dec 18, 2025New York City Council2.3 min2:00:15
  2. Nov 25, 2025New York City Council0.1 min20:04
  3. Nov 18, 2025Committee on Hospitals0.5 min1:07:00
  4. Nov 12, 2025New York City Council0.1 min45:54
  5. Oct 29, 2025New York City Council0.1 min1:05:04
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 410 council lines drawn, 352 right, 0 wrong, 1 unclear, 57 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Marmorato was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Kristy Marmorato’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Marmorato said. For councils and their committees, of 410 lines drawn, 352 were right, 0 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 57. We have since removed the voices behind 110 of those lines (0 wrong, 1 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 300 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 268: all 268 right (90% lower bound 0.99). They couldn’t judge the other 32. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Marmorato or of New York alone.