Kristy Marmorato
Former member, Council, New York City CouncilWe identified Marmorato’s voice at five meetings across two bodies.
Every roll call, and Marmorato’s other bodies
Present at 5 of 5 roll calls at the New York City Council, roll call through Dec 18, 2025
- New York City Council: talk time not compared. Seated for only 4 meetings in 12 months.
- Committee on Hospitals: talk time not compared. Seated for only 1 meeting in 12 months.
- Committee on Hospitals: present at 2 of 2 roll calls. Official roll call, from the clerk
- Committee on Environmental Protection, Resiliency and Waterfronts: present at 2 of 2 roll calls. Official roll call, from the clerk
- Committee on Health: present at 1 of 5 roll calls. Official roll call, from the clerk
- Committee on Veterans: present at 0 of 2 roll calls. Official roll call, from the clerk
One place Marmorato named in meetings
- Bronx 1 time
Every meeting where we identified Marmorato’s voice
- Dec 18, 2025New York City Council2.3 min2:00:15
- Nov 25, 2025New York City Council0.1 min20:04
- Nov 18, 2025Committee on Hospitals0.5 min1:07:00
- Nov 12, 2025New York City Council0.1 min45:54
- Oct 29, 2025New York City Council0.1 min1:05:04
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 410 council lines drawn, 352 right, 0 wrong, 1 unclear, 57 couldn’t be judged
A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Marmorato was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Kristy Marmorato’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Marmorato said. For councils and their committees, of 410 lines drawn, 352 were right, 0 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 57. We have since removed the voices behind 110 of those lines (0 wrong, 1 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 300 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 268: all 268 right (90% lower bound 0.99). They couldn’t judge the other 32. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Marmorato or of New York alone.