Oakland
Menu

Jennifer Renk

Oakland Planning Commission

We identified Renk’s voice at eight meetings.

8 of 11transcribed meetings with their voice identified
Talk time, and Renk’s other bodies
Neighborhoods Renk named

One place Renk named in meetings

Lines where Renk named the place, read by two AI readers that both agree it means that place. Each dot plays the newest one; brighter means named more often.

Oakland
  • Temescal 1 time

Places are drawn at the centre of their own boundary in the city’s neighborhoods (CEDA) file (City of Oakland Open Data Portal). A dot says the place was named, not where Renk was or what was said about it.

Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Renk’s voice

Eight, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Renk’s first remark.

  1. Sep 23, 2026Planning Commission2.0 min33:33
  2. Sep 2, 2026Planning Commission0.3 min8:57
  3. Jul 15, 2026Planning Commission0.9 min41:34
  4. Jun 3, 2026Planning Commission2.0 min35:23
  5. May 20, 2026Planning Commission3.2 min4:06
  6. Mar 18, 2026Planning Commission2.4 min2:25
  7. Feb 18, 2026Planning Commission0.9 min3:23
  8. Feb 4, 2026Planning Commission0.9 min1:23:40
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Renk was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Jennifer Renk’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Renk said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Renk or of Oakland alone.