Ricardo Garcia Acosta
Commission chair, Selection Panel Appointee, Oakland Police CommissionRaised ICE and immigration enforcement at six meetings.
Chairs the Police Commission
Next Police Commission meeting: Thu, Nov 12, 5:30 pm · Clerk’s calendar
Talk time, and Acosta’s other bodies
- Police Commission: talk time not compared. Presides over its meetings, so isn’t compared with the members.
2 places Acosta named in meetings
- North Oakland 1 time
- West Oakland 1 time
Every meeting where we identified Acosta’s voice
- Oct 8, 2026Police Commission35.8 min18:29
- Sep 24, 2026Police Commission23.3 min13:56
- Sep 10, 2026Police Commission24.0 min34:29
- Aug 13, 2026Police Commission21.3 min48:44
- Jul 23, 2026Police Commission29.7 min32:22
- Jun 25, 2026Police Commission32.4 min1:18:44
- Jun 18, 2026Police Commission28.3 min1:06:44
- May 28, 2026Police Commission20.8 min18:44
- May 14, 2026Police Commission30.3 min31:29
- Mar 12, 2026Police Commission9.1 min12:46
Show all 16Show fewer
- Feb 26, 2026Police Commission20.8 min14:40
- Feb 12, 2026Police Commission34.9 min11:34
- Jan 22, 2026Police Commission20.6 min15:42
- Jan 8, 2026Police Commission20.0 min13:49
- Dec 11, 2025Police Commission2.0 min17:51
- Nov 20, 2025Police Commission29.6 min12:42
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged
We identified Acosta’s voice at 16 meetings. A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Acosta was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Ricardo Garcia Acosta’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Acosta said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Acosta or of Oakland alone.