San Francisco
Menu

Allan Low

Vice president, San Francisco Fire Commission

We identified Low’s voice at nine meetings.

One clip, newest first

  • Allan Low · Commissioner · Fire Commission · Nov 12, 2025 · 1:59:35

    “Chief, so if I understand this correctly, the California code we must adopt. But we, the city, can adopt more restrictive requirements than the California Code. But the California Code we must adopt.”

Every roll call

Present at 6 of 8 roll calls at the Fire Commission, roll call through Jul 8, 2026

From the clerk’s own record. We don’t compare members on it.

PresentExcusedAbsentOldest first, 1 square per roll call

Excused 2 · Absent 0. Jan 14, 2026 to Jul 8, 2026. The clerk’s record covers 10 of the 13 meetings we hold, through Jul 8, 2026.

Official roll call, from the clerk →
Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Low’s voice

Nine, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Low’s first remark.

  1. Aug 12, 2026Fire CommissionFire and emergency services3.0 min0:13
  2. Jul 8, 2026Fire CommissionFire and emergency services1.1 min47:21
  3. Jun 10, 2026Fire CommissionFire and emergency services1.3 min1:17:54
  4. Apr 8, 2026Fire CommissionFire and emergency services1.7 min35:30
  5. Mar 11, 2026Fire CommissionFire and emergency services0.7 min1:22:39
  6. Feb 11, 2026Fire CommissionBudget and spending1.6 min1:17:55
  7. Jan 14, 2026Fire Commission1.5 min25:54
  8. Dec 10, 2025Fire Commission0.4 min38:28
  9. Nov 12, 2025Fire CommissionFire and emergency services3.4 min1:37:23
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Low was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Allan Low’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Low said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Low or of San Francisco alone.