San Francisco
Menu

Andrea Marmo Crawford

Vice chair, San Francisco General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee

Raised homelessness at three meetings.

One clip, newest first

  • Andrea Marmo Crawford · Member · General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee · Jun 8, 2026 · 4:19

    “First, let’s go with the city-owned homeless service sites. 1001 Polk Street and 525 5th Street together represent 57% of the city’s adult emergency shelter capacity, and both are in the final stages of significant renovation work— or yes, significant renovation work.”

Issues Crawford raised, by number of meetings

We count who raised an issue, not which side they took.

Every roll call, and Crawford’s other bodies

Present at 4 of 4 roll calls at the General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee, roll call through Jun 8, 2026

From the clerk’s own record. We don’t compare members on it.

PresentExcusedAbsentOldest first, 1 square per roll call

Absent 0. Oct 27, 2025 to Jun 8, 2026. The clerk’s record covers 5 of the 6 meetings we hold, through Jun 8, 2026.

Official roll call, from the clerk →
Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Crawford’s voice

Four, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Crawford’s first remark.

  1. Aug 10, 2026General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee0.4 min1:18:29
  2. Jun 8, 2026General Obligation Bond Oversight CommitteeBudget and spending11.7 min3:33
  3. Apr 13, 2026General Obligation Bond Oversight CommitteeBudget and spending1.9 min46:10
  4. Oct 27, 2025General Obligation Bond Oversight CommitteeBudget and spending1.9 min28:42
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 410 council lines drawn, 352 right, 0 wrong, 1 unclear, 57 couldn’t be judged

We identified Crawford’s voice at four meetings. A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Crawford was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Andrea Marmo Crawford’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Crawford said. For councils and their committees, of 410 lines drawn, 352 were right, 0 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 57. We have since removed the voices behind 110 of those lines (0 wrong, 1 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 300 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 268: all 268 right (90% lower bound 0.99). They couldn’t judge the other 32. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Crawford or of San Francisco alone.