San Francisco
Menu

Argemira Flórez Feng

Chair, San Francisco Ethics Commission

We identified Feng’s voice at eight meetings.

8 of 9transcribed meetings with their voice identified

Chairs the Ethics Commission

See all
Talk time, and Feng’s other bodies
  • Ethics Commission: talk time not compared. Presides over its meetings, so isn’t compared with the members.
Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Feng’s voice

Eight, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Feng’s first remark.

  1. Sep 11, 2026Ethics Commission2.9 min26:13
  2. Aug 14, 2026Ethics Commission3.2 minVideo
  3. Jul 10, 2026Ethics Commission19.0 minVideo
  4. Apr 10, 2026Ethics Commission0.9 min1:16:06
  5. Mar 13, 2026Ethics Commission3.6 min2:22
  6. Feb 13, 2026Ethics CommissionBudget and spending11.6 minVideo
  7. Jan 9, 2026Ethics CommissionBudget and spending7.6 minVideo
  8. Dec 12, 2025Ethics Commission3.6 minVideo
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Feng was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Argemira Flórez Feng’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Feng said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Feng or of San Francisco alone.