San Francisco
Menu

Ethics Commission · Mar 13, 2026

Friday30 min2 officials identified0 public speakers7 agenda itemsVideo: SFGovTV

The longest item after routine business: Discussion and Possible Action Regarding Proposed Amendments to Ethics Commission Streamlined Administrative Resolution Program, 14 min of this 30 min meeting.

  • Nov 251
  • Dec 251
  • Jan 261
  • Feb 261
  • Mar 261
  • Apr 261
  • Jul 261
  • Aug 261
  • Sep 261
9 meetings, all transcribed, Oct 24, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026.This meeting: Mar 13, 2026
0:00:0030:00

Click any time stamp on this page to jump the video there.

Agenda · 7 itemsShowHide
  1. 0:11Call to Order and Roll Call1 min · Routine business
  2. 2:10General Public Comment1 min · General public comment
  3. 3:57Item title withheldit could name a private person · 10 min
  4. 14:07Discussion and Possible Action Regarding Proposed Amendments to Ethics Commission Streamlined Administrative Resolution Program14 min
  5. 28:47Items for Future Meetingsunder 1 min · Routine business
  6. 29:14Additional Opportunity for General Public Commentunder 1 min · General public comment
  7. 29:36Adjournmentunder 1 min · Routine business

What happened

Each sentence checked against the transcript.

  1. On the motion to adopt the consent calendar, the result was announced as “with 3 votes in the affirmative, the motion passes.”3:34
  2. Enforcement Division staff presented the proposed stipulation, which covers 19 violations and administrative penalties totaling $42,611, and asked the Commission to approve it.4:02
  3. On the motion to adopt the proposed stipulation in item 8, the result was announced as “with 3 votes in the affirmative, the motion passes.”13:52
  4. On the motion to approve the proposed amendments to the Streamlined Administrative Resolution Program, the result was announced as “with 3 votes in the affirmative, the motion passes.”28:31

Who spoke

2 officials identified · talk time, most first.

Public comment: 0 speakers.

How we count

Each summary sentence is checked against the transcript before it is published; in a blind check, 99 of 100 sentences were right. A voice gets an official’s name only when two AI readers and a code check agree, so the minutes undercount and are not attendance. Officials only: members of the public are counted, never named, shown or quoted, and full transcripts aren’t published because they can carry their names. More on how we know

Cite this page

Hamlet, “Ethics Commission, Mar 13, 2026: San Francisco.” https://cities.myhamlet.com/sf/ethics/meetings/2026-03-13. Data as of Oct 9, 2026 (version d14b03c); meeting of Mar 13, 2026.