Billy Lemon
Member, Seat 8, San Francisco Our City Our Home Oversight CommitteeWe identified Lemon’s voice at six meetings.
Two clips, newest first
“…what is the new percentage on the cap for the short-term rental subsidies? If it’s not 12%, what is the new adjusted percentage?”
“Also, I think both budgets, both proposed by DPH and the HSH budget, meet the moment right now.”
Issues Lemon raised, by number of meetings
- Homelessness2 meetings
Every roll call
Present at 4 of 4 roll calls at the Our City Our Home Oversight Committee
Lemon asked three questions at the six Our City Our Home Oversight Committee meetings where we identified them
Of Lemon’s 2 questions to city departments at the Our City Our Home Oversight Committee, 1 went to public health and mental health.
| Department | Share | Questions |
|---|---|---|
| Public health and mental health | 1 | |
| Homelessness services | 1 |
Every meeting where we identified Lemon’s voice
- Aug 27, 2026Our City Our Home Oversight CommitteeBudget and spending5.3 min54:53
- Jun 5, 2026Our City Our Home Oversight CommitteeBudget and spending2.4 min28:37
- May 28, 2026Our City Our Home Oversight CommitteeHomelessness3.5 min18:41
- Apr 23, 2026Our City Our Home Oversight Committee3.3 min43:04
- Mar 26, 2026Our City Our Home Oversight Committee1.2 min1:42:12
- Jan 22, 2026Our City Our Home Oversight Committee2.0 min1:23
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 410 council lines drawn, 352 right, 0 wrong, 1 unclear, 57 couldn’t be judged
A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Lemon was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Billy Lemon’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Lemon said. For councils and their committees, of 410 lines drawn, 352 were right, 0 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 57. We have since removed the voices behind 110 of those lines (0 wrong, 1 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 300 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 268: all 268 right (90% lower bound 0.99). They couldn’t judge the other 32. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Lemon or of San Francisco alone.