Bruce Wolfe
Member, Seat 11, San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance Task ForceWe identified Wolfe’s voice at 14 meetings.
Next Sunshine Ordinance Task Force meeting: Wed, Nov 4, 4:00 pm · Clerk’s calendar
One clip, newest first
“Attorney-client privilege is to prevent the attorney from revealing information that could harm their case against the wishes or the desires of the client. Okay, the client— the information belongs to the client. Client can reveal the information anytime they want, but they hold the privilege to prevent the attorney from revealing it on their behalf.”
Every meeting where we identified Wolfe’s voice
- Oct 7, 2026Sunshine Ordinance Task Force27.0 min15:00
- Sep 30, 2026Sunshine Ordinance Task Force4.8 min56:42
- Jun 3, 2026Sunshine Ordinance Task Force11.0 min24:51
- May 6, 2026Sunshine Ordinance Task Force24.7 min18:06
- Apr 28, 2026Sunshine Ordinance Task Force16.5 min45:18
- Apr 1, 2026Sunshine Ordinance Task Force28.1 min8:40
- Mar 4, 2026Sunshine Ordinance Task Force19.8 min19:03
- Feb 24, 2026Sunshine Ordinance Task Force22.1 min39:47
- Feb 4, 2026Sunshine Ordinance Task Force18.9 min6:49
- Jan 7, 2026Sunshine Ordinance Task Force17.6 min27:06
Show all 14Show fewer
- Dec 30, 2025Sunshine Ordinance Task Force22.3 min23:11
- Dec 3, 2025Sunshine Ordinance Task Force9.9 min50:41
- Nov 5, 2025Sunshine Ordinance Task Force6.0 min2:49:43
- Oct 28, 2025Sunshine Ordinance Task Force31.5 min23:06
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged
A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Wolfe was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Bruce Wolfe’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Wolfe said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Wolfe or of San Francisco alone.