Carla Cuevas

Member, Board of Supervisors, San Francisco Sheriff's Department Oversight Board

We identified Cuevas’ voice at six meetings.

6 of 8transcribed meetings with their voice identified

42questions at the Sheriff's Department Oversight Board

2 of 2present at roll calls through Aug 7, 2026, from the clerk

Next Sheriff's Department Oversight Board meeting: Fri, Nov 6, 2:00 pm · Clerk’s calendar

Two clips, newest first

Carla Cuevas · Member · Sheriff's Department Oversight Board · Aug 7, 2026 · 1:06:56
“So according to this, is it possible to request the presence of someone from the sheriff’s office to speak about the crowding and why they haven’t complied with the policies specified in 511.2 AG, or maybe if per their assessment, the trigger is not there. Is it possible to ask them to be here for the next meeting?”
Carla Cuevas · Member · Sheriff's Department Oversight Board · May 1, 2026 · 1:01:35
“Do you know how is it going to generate overtime for deputies if you already have hired more deputies who can do this job?”

Every roll call, and Cuevas’ other bodies

Present at 2 of 2 roll calls at the Sheriff's Department Oversight Board, roll call through Aug 7, 2026

From the clerk’s own record. We don’t compare members on it.

PresentExcusedAbsentOldest first, 1 square per roll call

Absent 0. May 1, 2026 to Aug 7, 2026. The clerk’s record covers 9 of the 12 meetings we hold, through Aug 7, 2026.

Official roll call, from the clerk →

Sheriff's Department Oversight Board: talk time not compared. Fewer than four members can be compared fairly.

Questions

Cuevas asked 42 questions at the six Sheriff's Department Oversight Board meetings where we identified them

At least this many: direct questions only.

Of Cuevas’ 19 questions to city departments at the Sheriff's Department Oversight Board, 19 went to sheriff, jails and probation.

Who they question: 19 questions to a department, 1 body · Oct 24, 2025 – Oct 8, 2026.

Sheriff's Department Oversight Board19 questions to city departments

Sheriff's Department Oversight Board: questions by department
Department	Share	Questions
Sheriff, jails and probation		19100%

Neighborhoods Cuevas named

One place Cuevas named in meetings

Lines where Cuevas named the place, read by two AI readers that both agree it means that place. Each dot plays the newest one; brighter means named more often.

San Francisco

South of Market 1 time

Places are drawn at the centre of their own boundary in the city’s Analysis Neighborhoods file (DataSF (City and County of San Francisco)). A dot says the place was named, not where Cuevas was or what was said about it.

Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Cuevas’ voice

Six, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Cuevas’ first remark.

Oct 2, 2026Sheriff's Department Oversight BoardPolicing and public safety1.6 min22:37
Sep 18, 2026Sheriff's Department Oversight BoardPolicing and public safety21.6 min15:17
Sep 4, 2026Sheriff's Department Oversight BoardPolicing and public safety4.4 min1:12:50
Aug 7, 2026Sheriff's Department Oversight BoardPolicing and public safety6.4 min31:50
Jul 24, 2026Sheriff's Department Oversight BoardPolicing and public safety5.7 min1:25:00
May 1, 2026Sheriff's Department Oversight BoardPolicing and public safety10.7 min6:50

How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Cuevas was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Carla Cuevas’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Cuevas said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Cuevas or of San Francisco alone.