San Francisco
Menu

Carolyn Tyler

Commissioner, San Francisco Film Commission

We identified Tyler’s voice at six meetings.

One clip, newest first

  • Carolyn Tyler · Commissioner · Film Commission · Feb 9, 2026 · 1:07:22

    “That if the action— if the reality is that no matter what, this moves forward, A no vote can be extremely symbolic of the fact that we don’t like this and we don’t like the way this department is being treated. So there’s some power to me in that, even if it’s just symbolic.”

Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Tyler’s voice

Six, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Tyler’s first remark.

  1. Jul 1, 2026Film Commission1.4 min46:55
  2. May 21, 2026Film Commission1.9 min58:17
  3. Feb 9, 2026Film Commission3.5 min12:49
  4. Jan 12, 2026Film Commission1.8 min54:54
  5. Dec 17, 2025Film Commission0.1 min46:01
  6. Oct 27, 2025Film Commission0.9 min1:24:09
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Tyler was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Carolyn Tyler’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Tyler said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Tyler or of San Francisco alone.