San Francisco
Menu

Cathy Mosbrucker

Commissioner, Tenant, San Francisco Rent Board Commission

We identified Mosbrucker’s voice at eight meetings.

Next Rent Board Commission meeting: Tue, Nov 10, 6:00 pm · Clerk’s calendar

One clip, newest first

  • Cathy Mosbrucker · Commissioner · Rent Board Commission · Sep 8, 2026 · 31:52

    “These rules are made to prevent landlords from starting the eviction process before the construction process is ready to even begin. And that’s why we require that the permits be applied for before a notice to quit is given. And to that extent, we have to enforce our rules and regulations.”

Every roll call, and Mosbrucker’s other bodies

Present at 9 of 9 roll calls at the Rent Board Commission, roll call through Aug 11, 2026

From the clerk’s own record. We don’t compare members on it.

PresentExcusedAbsentOldest first, 1 square per roll call

Absent 0. Nov 18, 2025 to Aug 11, 2026. The clerk’s record covers 9 of the 12 meetings we hold, through Aug 11, 2026.

Official roll call, from the clerk →
Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Mosbrucker’s voice

Eight, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Mosbrucker’s first remark.

  1. Sep 8, 2026Rent Board Commission4.9 min27:21
  2. Jul 14, 2026Rent Board Commission3.0 min36:23
  3. Jun 9, 2026Rent Board Commission2.3 min1:51
  4. May 12, 2026Rent Board Commission1.1 min15:24
  5. Feb 10, 2026Rent Board Commission1.2 min20:14
  6. Jan 13, 2026Rent Board Commission5.4 min29:26
  7. Dec 9, 2025Rent Board Commission0.9 min19:35
  8. Nov 18, 2025Rent Board Commission4.8 min18:59
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Mosbrucker was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Cathy Mosbrucker’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Mosbrucker said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Mosbrucker or of San Francisco alone.