San Francisco
Menu
Photo: official page

Dominica Henderson

Director, SFMTA Board of Directors

We identified Henderson’s voice at 18 meetings.

18 of 20transcribed meetings with their voice identified
45questions at the SFMTA Board of Directors

One clip, newest first

  • Dominica Henderson · Director · SFMTA Board of Directors · Nov 4, 2025 · 55:16

    “Are there any deadlines since this is a grant-funded project or proposal? Are there any deadlines that might be impacted by moving it to another hearing?”

Talk time, and Henderson’s other bodies
  • SFMTA Board of Directors: talk time not compared. On a random sample of meeting time, between 59% and 83% of members' speech here carries a name; we rank when the low end reaches 60%.
What they talk about

Streets, traffic and parking took the largest share of Henderson’s speech with a checked topic: 45%

By the agenda item on the floor when they spoke, at the SFMTA Board of Directors (clerk’s agenda times). 71 of 98 minutes of their speech have a checked topic. How much they talk about it, not which side they take.

Streets, traffic and parking45%
Questions

Henderson asked 45 questions at the 18 SFMTA Board of Directors meetings where we identified them

At least this many: direct questions only.

Of Henderson’s 44 questions to city departments at the SFMTA Board of Directors, 44 went to transportation and transit.

Who they question: 44 questions to a department, 1 body · Oct 24, 2025 – Oct 8, 2026.

SFMTA Board of Directors44 questions to city departments
SFMTA Board of Directors: questions by department
DepartmentShareQuestions
Transportation and transit44100%
Neighborhoods Henderson named

One place Henderson named in meetings

Lines where Henderson named the place, read by two AI readers that both agree it means that place. Each dot plays the newest one; brighter means named more often.

San Francisco
  • Bayview Hunters Point 2 times

Places are drawn at the centre of their own boundary in the city’s Analysis Neighborhoods file (DataSF (City and County of San Francisco)). A dot says the place was named, not where Henderson was or what was said about it.

Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Henderson’s voice

18, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Henderson’s first remark.

  1. Oct 6, 2026SFMTA Board of Directors6.7 min2:44:39
  2. Sep 1, 2026SFMTA Board of Directors3.5 min21:10
  3. Aug 4, 2026SFMTA Board of Directors1.0 min1:03:50
  4. Jul 21, 2026SFMTA Board of Directors4.9 min17:06
  5. Jun 16, 2026SFMTA Board of Directors6.3 min3:15:24
  6. Jun 2, 2026SFMTA Board of Directors0.3 min16:52
  7. May 19, 2026SFMTA Board of DirectorsBudget and spending10.0 min1:33:56
  8. Apr 21, 2026SFMTA Board of DirectorsBudget and spending7.2 min1:37:57
  9. Apr 7, 2026SFMTA Board of DirectorsBudget and spending3.2 min2:00:42
  10. Mar 3, 2026SFMTA Board of DirectorsHousing and tenants9.0 min14:00
Show all 18Show fewer
  1. Feb 17, 2026SFMTA Board of DirectorsBudget and spending5.3 min14:10
  2. Feb 3, 2026SFMTA Board of DirectorsBudget and spending8.9 min2:26:08
  3. Jan 20, 2026SFMTA Board of Directors3.9 min2:21:36
  4. Jan 6, 2026SFMTA Board of Directors2.2 min1:59:46
  5. Dec 16, 2025SFMTA Board of Directors1.1 min17:54
  6. Dec 2, 2025SFMTA Board of Directors9.7 min2:05:51
  7. Nov 18, 2025SFMTA Board of Directors10.2 min27:39
  8. Nov 4, 2025SFMTA Board of DirectorsPublic transit4.5 min1:07:19
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Henderson was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Dominica Henderson’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Henderson said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Henderson or of San Francisco alone.