San Francisco
Menu

Jose Lopez

Commissioner, San Francisco Board of Appeals

We identified Lopez’s voice at 15 meetings.

15 of 23transcribed meetings with their voice identified
7.5min a meeting at the Board of Appeals, at least
18 of 18present at roll calls, from the clerk
Share card

Next Board of Appeals meeting: Wed, Nov 4, 5:00 pm · Clerk’s calendar

Every roll call

Present at 18 of 18 roll calls at the Board of Appeals

From the clerk’s own record. We don’t compare members on it.

PresentExcusedAbsentOldest first, 1 square per roll call

Absent 0. Oct 29, 2025 to Sep 16, 2026. The clerk’s record covers 23 of the 26 meetings we hold, through Sep 16, 2026.

Official roll call, from the clerk →
Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Lopez’s voice

15, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Lopez’s first remark.

  1. Oct 7, 2026Board of AppealsDevelopment and land use5.7 min55:26
  2. Sep 16, 2026Board of AppealsAlcohol, cannabis and business permits14.5 min2:02:09
  3. Jul 15, 2026Board of AppealsDevelopment and land use0.8 min49:52
  4. Jul 8, 2026Board of AppealsAlcohol, cannabis and business permits11.2 min29:45
  5. May 27, 2026Board of AppealsDevelopment and land use12.7 min53:18
  6. May 20, 2026Board of AppealsDevelopment and land use · Alcohol, cannabis and business permits25.7 min26:31
  7. Apr 29, 2026Board of AppealsAlcohol, cannabis and business permits · Development and land use9.2 min2:55:56
  8. Apr 22, 2026Board of AppealsDevelopment and land use18.2 min24:47
  9. Apr 15, 2026Board of AppealsDevelopment and land use9.3 min7:37
  10. Mar 11, 2026Board of AppealsDevelopment and land use5.6 min1:25:10
Show all 15Show fewer
  1. Mar 4, 2026Board of AppealsDevelopment and land use4.5 min18:36
  2. Jan 28, 2026Board of AppealsDevelopment and land use · Alcohol, cannabis and business permits24.4 min1:02:16
  3. Dec 17, 2025Board of AppealsDevelopment and land use · Commendations, ceremonies and memorials5.7 min2:00:46
  4. Dec 10, 2025Board of AppealsCommendations, ceremonies and memorials · Development and land use7.1 min15:59
  5. Nov 5, 2025Board of AppealsAlcohol, cannabis and business permits17.2 min3:05:50
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Lopez was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Jose Lopez’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Lopez said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Lopez or of San Francisco alone.