What John Trasviña said on Mar 11, 2026
I’m reading in— again, we’re getting the issue that was of concern to me, and I think has been expressed throughout this, is what notice does the vendor have? A vendor or vendors collectively? As I understand it, the notice of violation, which you put up on the screen, needs to follow Section 5.9–11, notice of violation.John TrasviñaMember · Board of Appeals · Mar 11, 2026 56:50Open the meeting at 56:50
Four members, 4.8 to 7.5 minutes a meeting (preliminary)
Preliminary: at least 70% of members’ talk time is identified, under the 80% for a full comparison. All four members we compare could rank first; the data can’t order them.
Latest meetings
- Oct 251
- Nov 252
- Dec 252
- Jan 262
- Feb 261
- Mar 263
- Apr 263
- May 262
- Jun 261
- Jul 262
- Aug 262
- Sep 263
- Oct 262
3 more meetings are not transcribed yet.
Listed after the newest meeting above, not transcribed yet (video listings through Oct 23): 1
Development and land use took 67% of the Board of Appeals’ meeting time, more than at most bodies in the city
Share of meeting time by topic, from the clerk’s agenda times · 26 meetings, 78 hours · Oct 24, 2025 – Oct 23, 2026, the clerk’s times also cover meetings not yet transcribed
bar = share of meeting time · line = 90% range · tick = typical San Francisco body (shown where it is 0.5% or more)
Five public speakers a meeting; the biggest crowd, 36, came on May 20, 2026
bar = public speakers at that meeting · tick = average meeting