San Francisco
Menu

Robin Abad Ocubillo

Commissioner, San Francisco Board of Appeals

We identified Ocubillo’s voice at 13 meetings.

13 of 20transcribed meetings with their voice identified
6.8min a meeting at the Board of Appeals, at least
11 of 11present at roll calls, from the clerk
Share card

Next Board of Appeals meeting: Wed, Nov 4, 5:00 pm · Clerk’s calendar

Every roll call

Present at 11 of 11 roll calls at the Board of Appeals

From the clerk’s own record. We don’t compare members on it.

PresentExcusedAbsentOldest first, 1 square per roll call

Absent 0. Jan 14, 2026 to Sep 16, 2026. The clerk’s record covers 23 of the 26 meetings we hold, through Sep 16, 2026.

Official roll call, from the clerk →
Meetings

Every meeting where we identified Ocubillo’s voice

13, newest first. The date opens the meeting; the time plays the video at Ocubillo’s first remark.

  1. Oct 7, 2026Board of AppealsDevelopment and land use15.4 min38:24
  2. Sep 23, 2026Board of AppealsDevelopment and land use13.8 min43:41
  3. Sep 16, 2026Board of AppealsAlcohol, cannabis and business permits15.9 min3:28:37
  4. Aug 12, 2026Board of AppealsDevelopment and land use6.8 min1:15:05
  5. Jul 15, 2026Board of AppealsDevelopment and land use4.8 min28:31
  6. May 27, 2026Board of AppealsDevelopment and land use11.5 min31:40
  7. May 20, 2026Board of AppealsDevelopment and land use · Alcohol, cannabis and business permits13.4 min19:46
  8. Apr 29, 2026Board of AppealsAlcohol, cannabis and business permits9.2 min46:30
  9. Apr 22, 2026Board of AppealsDevelopment and land use12.7 min27:09
  10. Mar 25, 2026Board of AppealsHealth and behavioral health2.9 min48:58
Show all 13Show fewer
  1. Feb 18, 2026Board of AppealsDevelopment and land use11.0 min55:31
  2. Jan 28, 2026Board of AppealsDevelopment and land use13.3 min2:26:42
  3. Jan 14, 2026Board of AppealsDevelopment and land use5.0 min6:25
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 340 commission lines drawn, 260 right, 4 wrong, 1 unclear, 75 couldn’t be judged

A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Ocubillo was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Robin Abad Ocubillo’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Ocubillo said. For commissions, of 340 lines drawn, 260 were right, 4 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 75. We have since removed the voices behind 64 of those lines (3 wrong, 0 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 276 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 228: 226 right, 1 wrong and 1 unclear (90% lower bound 0.97). They couldn’t judge the other 48. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Ocubillo or of San Francisco alone.