Lindsay Haddix
Member, Seat 1, San Francisco Our City Our Home Oversight CommitteeRaised homelessness at four meetings.
Two clips, newest first
“The large vehicle outreach program was listed as a prevention program. So I guess I’m just curious why it’s being listed as prevention if folks that are, you know, at least according to, you know, when you do the PIT count and stuff, people living in their vehicles are considered as experiencing homelessness already.”
“…my question is, I’m wondering how you’re going to determine who’s receiving rent recovery and, and, and the amounts of recovery that they— rent recovery that they would receive?”
Issues Haddix raised, by number of meetings
- Homelessness4 meetings
Every roll call
Present at 4 of 5 roll calls at the Our City Our Home Oversight Committee, roll call through Jun 5, 2026
Haddix asked five questions at the four Our City Our Home Oversight Committee meetings where we identified them
Of Haddix’s 5 questions to city departments at the Our City Our Home Oversight Committee, 5 went to homelessness services.
| Department | Share | Questions |
|---|---|---|
| Homelessness services | 5100% |
One place Haddix named in meetings
- Treasure Island 1 time
Every meeting where we identified Haddix’s voice
- Jun 5, 2026Our City Our Home Oversight CommitteeBudget and spending3.3 min38:18
- May 28, 2026Our City Our Home Oversight CommitteeHomelessness4.3 min16:59
- Apr 23, 2026Our City Our Home Oversight Committee3.7 min35:21
- Feb 26, 2026Our City Our Home Oversight CommitteeBudget and spending6.6 min11:56
How we identify who is speaking · blind check, pooled across five cities: of 410 council lines drawn, 352 right, 0 wrong, 1 unclear, 57 couldn’t be judged
We identified Haddix’s voice at four meetings. A meeting missing here means we couldn’t attribute the voice, not that Haddix was absent. Claude and Gemini each read every transcript with that day’s roster. A voice gets Lindsay Haddix’s name only when both agree and a code check finds the name said on, or just before, their turn. Voices our transcripts merge with someone else’s are never attributed, so every count here undercounts what Haddix said. For councils and their committees, of 410 lines drawn, 352 were right, 0 wrong and 1 unclear, and the checkers couldn’t judge 57. We have since removed the voices behind 110 of those lines (0 wrong, 1 unclear, the rest we had already held for other reasons). Of the 300 lines we still publish, the checkers could judge 268: all 268 right (90% lower bound 0.99). They couldn’t judge the other 32. The check is one sample pooled across the five cities, not of Haddix or of San Francisco alone.